In military theory, what is often a requirement for a view to be validated?

In military theory, validation of a view or concept typically hinges on its practical application in real-world scenarios, particularly in the context of warfare. The ability to demonstrate that a theory or strategy can be effectively implemented and produce tangible results in combat situations is crucial. This empirical evidence showcases not only the viability of the theory but also its adaptability to the complexities of warfare.

A view that has undergone rigorous testing in actual military operations is more likely to garner acceptance within the military community, as it shows that the theory can withstand the unpredictable nature of combat. The focus on practical application underscores the necessity for theories in military strategy to be actionable and relevant, ensuring that they can be relied upon in the dynamic environment of armed conflict. Thus, validation comes from the outcomes achieved through these practical applications rather than through endorsements, audits, or recognitions.